Volume 4, Issue 4, December 2019, Page: 93-98
Natural Science Value of Linguistics in Historical Research
Antipenko Leonid Grigoryevich, Institute of Philosophy, Department of the Philosophy of Natural Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
Received: Jul. 18, 2019;       Accepted: Aug. 26, 2019;       Published: Dec. 24, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.ellc.20190404.12      View  31      Downloads  14
Martin Heidegger divided the researchers engaged in questions of history into two categories - historians and historiographers. Historiographers are immersed in the study of language texts and other artifacts left over from the past. Historians go further. They seek to immerse themselves in the flow of historical time and, in addition to the study of linguistic written texts, to present the sounding speech of the past human generations. To present speech is to have some experience in this regard. This experience is taken, according to Heidegger, from poetic and musical creativity. From this it is concluded that the historical events or even entire epochs are resonated, just as the harmonic consonance between the musical phrases of a symphony or sonata performed in time is realized. These phenomena are discussed in this article. To this it must be added that the results obtained in the article are not the fruits of musical-poetic intuition alone. They undergo rigorous testing in accordance with Heidegger's developed dialectic technique, based on the logical operation restored by him in philosophy and called privation.
Language, Speech, Historical Time, History and Historiography
To cite this article
Antipenko Leonid Grigoryevich, Natural Science Value of Linguistics in Historical Research, English Language, Literature & Culture. Vol. 4, No. 4, 2019, pp. 93-98. doi: 10.11648/j.ellc.20190404.12
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologia [Lévi Strauss C. Structural anthropology]. Moscow, 1985. P. 188-189.
Khaydegger, Martin. Vremya i Bytiye [Heidegger, Martin. Time and Being]. Moscow: «Respublika», 1993. Pp. 279, 396, 402-403, 403. 397, 312, 269, 171, 400.
Khaydegger, Martin. Tsolikonovskiye seminary (Protokoly Besedy ̶ Piś ma) [Heidegger, Martin. Zollikonovsky seminars (Protocols Conservations Letters)]. Viĺnys: Evropeyskiy gumaniternyy universitet, 2012. Pp. 253, 260, 86, 87.
Heidegger, Martin. Sein und Zeit. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen, 1967.
Heidegger, Martin. Überlegungen II - VI (Schwarze Hefte 1931− 1938). Vittorio Klostermann GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, 2014. V, S. 78.
Martin Khaidegger sam o sebe v izlozhenii Vaĺtera Bimelya [Martin Heidegger himself as presented by Walter Bimel]. Ural LTD, 1998. P.244.
Kolesov V. V. Drevnyaya Ruś: naslediye v slove [Kolesov V. V. Ancient Russia: a legacy in the word]. SPb, 2000.
Chertkov A. D. O yazyke pelasgov, naselivshikh Italiyu i sravneniye yego s drevle-slavynskim [Chertkov A. D. On the language of the Pelasgians who inhabited Italy and its comparison with ancient Slavic]. Moscow: Universitet. tipografiya, 1855.
Tolstoi L. N. Sobr. Soch.v 12 tomakh. T.6. [Tolstoi L. N. Sobr. cit. in 12 volums]. Moscow: izd. «Pravda», 1987. Pp. 315, 359, 359-360.
Khomyakov A. S. «Semiramida». Issledovaniye istoricheskikh idey // Soch. v 2 t. T.1 [Khomyakov A. S. «Semiramide». Study of historical ideas]. Moscow, 1994. P. 274.
Murav́yov V. N. Ovladeniye vremenem [Muravyov V. N. Mastering time]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 1998. Pp. 269, 270, 154, 154-155, 108.
Antipenko L. G. Yestestvennonauchnaya otsenka postmodernistskogo podchoda k lingvistike i litreraturnomu tvorchestvu [Natural Science Assessment of Post-modernist Approach to Linguistics and Literary Creativity]. Yazyk i tekst [Language and text], 2018, t.5, №2. Pp. 14-23.
Browse journals by subject